Tue, Mar 10th, 2009 |
Call me a crusty skeptic, but I think it'd be hard for entertainers - some of whom are already ostentatiously wealthy - to get Washington to help them out in the best of times.
So my gut is that there's little chance that Congress will pass something called "The Performance Rights Act", which would force radio stations to pay musicians - or at least music labels - whenever they play one of their recordings.
Read the whole story on AllThingsD or try our Toolbar
Related Topics:
Related Stories:
- Vodafone is ditching DRM on most of its music downloads, enabling its tracks to be used on a variety of devices. The company announced today that it had signed deals with three of the Big Four music labels-EMI...
- The concept of building a Digg for music has been tried before (see Contrastream or iJigg), but a music streaming site called thesixtyone is the closest I've seen so far to getting the formula right.
- I had a surprisingly candid lunch conversation last week with a big music label executive, and a good part of our talk focused on the future of music. I asked the usual...
- When it comes to promoting new music, pay-for-play schemes are generally frowned upon. The practice, which involves music labels or artists paying radio stations to play their songs in heavy rotation...
- Vodafone Music goes DRM-free, throws in free upgrades
- U2 is No Coldplay, David Letterman is No Apple
- Eminem producers lose bid for massive iTunes royalties
- Thesixtyone Is Building a Digg For Indie Music
- Eminem firm loses iTunes royalty lawsuit against Universal
- Big Music Will Surrender, But Not Until At Least 2011
- Pay-For-Play Comes To Online Radio. Is That a Bad Thing?
- Who Needs Big Music on YouTube? The Best Video of 2009 is Homegrown
- Taiwan DRAM Bailout Leads to Creation of Single Company
- MacHeist offers free licenses for DEVONthink via Twitter promotion



